User profile

Status:
Name:
Nickname:
Member since:
Website URL:
About me:
 

User comments

CENSUS DATA MATCHED NATIONAL EXIT POLL WEIGHTS(12:22AM, 13047 SAMPLE). Why won't the media report this?

May 30th, 2005 at 10:30 am

Actually, I was at work for 10 hours yesterday trying to reply to you when possible. Do you do anything besides patiently wait for posts to attack? I already mentioned EIRS, as well as all of the links to information I’ve collected, what more do you want? Allowing Bush to get away with cheating the second time, lie us into an illegal war, help corporations and the rich at the expense of everyone else, it makes no sense at all think anything will change until someone gets busted for their crimes!

CENSUS DATA MATCHED NATIONAL EXIT POLL WEIGHTS(12:22AM, 13047 SAMPLE). Why won't the media report this?

May 29th, 2005 at 6:27 pm

“pursuing the silly conspiracy theories”

Any time two or more people meet and have an idea, it’s technically a “conspiracy theory”. Get over the labelling, it does no good. It’s a way to disregard the issue.

I don’t have time to pick through each of your statements, but sadly, I guarantee you that you are wrong. There were considerably more irregularities in 2004, and they are documented. I do agree this is not the first election to be fixed, there’s at least a 40 year history of vote manipulation in the US, that does NOT make it OK!

There is far too much hot air in your previous comment to reply to, so I’ll just go on proving the fraudulent 2004 election and preventing another one, and you go on doing…..what is it you’re doing?

“You may as well ask why MSM is not seriously reporting on the “fact” that Moon landings were staged in Hollywood studios.” – Jesus man, you’re reaching.

I have about 400 or so links to evidence on my other page, http://2004electiontheft.com, articles and research posted in alternative media that could just as easily have been mainstream media, if the MSM weren’t bought and sold corporate whores.

I hope you enjoy living in a dictatorship.

CENSUS DATA MATCHED NATIONAL EXIT POLL WEIGHTS(12:22AM, 13047 SAMPLE). Why won't the media report this?

May 29th, 2005 at 2:18 pm

Sorry about that whole pursuing the truth thing, I know it annoys you.

What about vote spoilage? I think that is why the census numbers are inflated. People vote, but their votes didn’t count.

No more fraud in this election than any? Really? Can you back up that statement?

I don’t think the evidence is flimsy at all, I think if the main stream media reported on this, there would be a huge movement to reform the election system.

I have to get back to work now –

CENSUS DATA MATCHED NATIONAL EXIT POLL WEIGHTS(12:22AM, 13047 SAMPLE). Why won't the media report this?

May 29th, 2005 at 2:06 pm

I retracted that the census didn’t match the final exit poll, didn’t you read?
The original post also does not make this claim, there is nothing false in it…read it again.

You don’t have to try to find info. to validate your preconceptions, the corporate media is on your side. REAL news and information is harder to come by.

No one takes TIA seriously? Plenty of people take TIA seriously, and he has influenced many many people to pursue the truth about this issue. Where do you get this crap?

I don’t know what point you’re trying to make. There is a mountain of evidence to support that this election was fraudulent.

If you believe it was legitimate, do you believe the election system is foolproof? There were over 30,000 problems reported to EIRS on election day, and about the same numbe to several other organizations…. our election system has A LOT of problems.

Don’t you want your vote to count? This is not a partisan issue.

The absolute only solution is hand counted paper ballots, there is absolutely no reason anybody who believes in democracy would argue against this, no?

CENSUS DATA MATCHED NATIONAL EXIT POLL WEIGHTS(12:22AM, 13047 SAMPLE). Why won't the media report this?

May 29th, 2005 at 1:34 pm

Actually, bigmustlid, there is nothing incorrect in the original post, read it. There is also nothing to explain.

Second, I have seen plenty of people contradict TIA on DU and have seen very few get banned and have posts deleted…unless they are very disrespectful and combative. Have you been banned? Probably.

Third, just as you accused me of having my “blinders on too tight”, it does matter whether you think Bush legitimately won or not, just as it matters that I don’t. Yes I will try to find any information to validate my point, just as you will. I just want to be up front about this. I do not hide behind my politics, I wear them on my sleeve. More honest that way.

I think the truth of this argument is that the census is probably closer to correct about how many people actually voted, because it does not account for spoiled votes. Thousands, if not millions of votes are spoiled every election, the majority in democratic precintcs (lower income, outdated machinery, not enough machines).

Have you read, listened, and watched all the links in the “2004 Election Fraud Beginner’s Guide”? I think you should.

CENSUS DATA MATCHED NATIONAL EXIT POLL WEIGHTS(12:22AM, 13047 SAMPLE). Why won't the media report this?

May 29th, 2005 at 12:39 pm

Ok, you’re right. For now. So, do you believe Bush legitimately won this election? Just a question…

CENSUS DATA MATCHED NATIONAL EXIT POLL WEIGHTS(12:22AM, 13047 SAMPLE). Why won't the media report this?

May 29th, 2005 at 10:50 am

Ok, you basically proved the point, which is the exit poll was correct. The point is that the demographics of the census do NOT match the demographics of the final exit poll (that was adjusted to match the “results”), while they DO match the earlier exit poll that had Kerry winning. That is all.

This information, irregardless of voting patterns and party registration, proves this point:

The Census closely matched the weights of the following
demographics:
GenderCensusPoll
Male46.49% 46%
Female53.51% 54%

Income
15-3012.08%15%
30-5020.58%22%
50-7520.02%23%
100-15013.55%11%

Education
Some College30.96%31%
College Grad26.84%26%

Anything else?

I won’t waste my time arguing with you from this point, because you obviosly believe the Bush won conspiracy.

CENSUS DATA MATCHED NATIONAL EXIT POLL WEIGHTS(12:22AM, 13047 SAMPLE). Why won't the media report this?

May 28th, 2005 at 11:48 pm

Christ, answer the question already! Why did the incorrect (in your opinion) census data match the exit poll demographics. This lends CREDIBILITY to both numbers, because how could they possibly both be wrong in exactly the same way….HOW?

CENSUS DATA MATCHED NATIONAL EXIT POLL WEIGHTS(12:22AM, 13047 SAMPLE). Why won't the media report this?

May 28th, 2005 at 9:53 pm

bigmustlid,

I am sorry, this time I will leave your post. I think you are absolutely wrong however, and you didn’t aswer my comment either, so I guess you don’t have a leg to stand on.

CENSUS DATA MATCHED NATIONAL EXIT POLL WEIGHTS(12:22AM, 13047 SAMPLE). Why won't the media report this?

May 28th, 2005 at 7:19 pm

I REMOVED, yes CENSORED a comment that basically said the Census data was bullsh*t. Funny that, the exit polls are wrong, the census data is wrong, I suppose any data not supporting the Bush crime family is wrong. Poster also mentioned how DU hates the truth. I have seen far more truth on DU than pretty much any other website in the last 6 months. If the census data is flawed, how can it be flawed in EXACTLY the same way as the 12:22am exit poll? Explain that.