Once again, the FINAL National Exit Poll does NOT compute.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/US/H/00/epolls.0.html
THE DEMOCRATS DID MUCH BETTER THAN THE FINAL EXIT POLL
INDICATES!
They always do.
Remember Kerry in 2004?
He won the 13047 respondent National Exit Poll timeline
at 12:22am by 51-47%.
But the Final Exit Poll (13660 respondents at 2pm) said Bush
won by 51-48%.
Fast forward to 2006.
The 7pm Montana exit poll said Tester won by 53-46.
The Final Exit Poll: 50-47.5
The recorded vote: 49-48
The 7pm Virginia exit poll said Webb won by 53-46.
The Final Exit Poll: 50.1-49.9
The recorded vote: 50-49.
What do 2004 and 2006 also have in common?
The Final Exit Poll was matched to the recorded vote.
It always is. That's SOP.
The Democratic vote was 3% too low.
Bottom line:
If the recorded vote was bogus and the election was rigged
through uncounted ballots and switched votes, you would
never know it from the Final Exit Poll.
But if you view the earlier exit poll timeline, you would
be alerted to fraud. And if you analyze the demographics,
you would confirm the theft.
Let's start our analysis with the 116 GENERIC PRE-ELECTION
POLL TREND LINE. The Democratic vote share has been a
steadily increasing trend line.
On Nov. 7, the Dems held a 14.6% lead over the GOP.
Here's graphic proof:
http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/Election2006_16921_image001.png
The Generic trend line on Nov.7:
Dem 51.8% - GOP 38.6%
Convert to 2-party shares:
Dem 57.3% - GOP 42.7%
That's a 14.6% spread.
We will refer to the 14% spread in the following analysis.
_________________________________________
Lets look at the 2006 NATIONAL EXIT POLL, posted on CNN:
PARTY-ID
..... Mix Dem Rep
Dem 38% 90% 9% C 38% too low, 90% too low, 9% too high
Rep 38% 7% 93% C 38% too high, 93% too high, 7% too low
Ind 25% 49% 46% C 49% WTF! Independents voted 60/40 for Dems
Total 101% 49.1% 50.3% C WTF! Are they serious?
IT'S PROOF THAT THE 2006 FINAL EXIT POLL IS BOGUS:
According to poll, the GOP won by 50.3-49.1%.
Really?
1) 2006 Voters identified as 38% Democratic, 38% Republican,
25%
Independent.
THIS IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE !
Here's why:
a) The weights don't sum to 100.
OK, no big deal here.
b) Dems outnumbered Repubs.
Who was more motivated to vote this time?
c) The weights were 38D-35R-27I at the 12:22am 2004 NEP
timeline.
Look it up.
d) THE CLINCHER:
The 2006 vote based on PARTY-ID weights/vote shares
are IMPOSSIBLE! If the weights/shares are to be
believed, then the GOP won the Generic vote! Why,
then, would you believe them?
The NEP UNDERSTATES the Democratic Generic vote share by 7%.
It OVERSTATES the GOP Generic vote share by 7%.
How do we know this?
Simple. The Dems won the final Generic Polls by more than
14%!
Since 2004, the Final NEP has become laughable, a sick joke.
Don't they realize they can't fool us anymore?
Don't they realize that we can crunch the numbers?
Would someone please get this to Olbermann?
2006 NATIONAL EXIT POLL
Sample 13208 MOE 0.87%
Weights/shares adjusted to derive a 12% Democratic Generic
spread
PARTY-ID (adjusted)
Dem 40% 93% 7%
Rep 35% 11% 89%
Ind 25% 60% 40%
Total 100% 56.1% 44.0%
That's more like it!
________________________________________________
HOW VOTED IN 2004
Using this demographic, the spread is 55.8 Dem-44.2 GOP.
That's an 11.6% spread. But it's too low. Why?
Because the Bush/Kerry/Other weights are bogus.
Kerry won by 52-47%. The third party vote was 1%.
This is an analysis of how impossible Final Exit Poll weights
were used to match a corrupt 2004 vote count:
http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/BogusWeights.htm
2006 NATIONAL EXIT POLL
Sample 13208 MOE 0.87%
HOW VOTED in 2004
........Mix Dem GOP
Kerry 45% 94% 5%
Bush 46% 13% 85%
Other 5% 62% 21%
No 4% 79% 18%
Total 97.6% 54.5% 43.1%
2-pty 100% 55.8% 44.2%
Now let's adjust the weights and vote shares to
derive a 14% spread.
We use 51 Kerry/46 Bush/1 Other/2 No weights.
The adjusted weights are based on the TRUE Kerry/Bush
vote BEFORE it was stolen with uncounted spoiled/lost
ballots and vote switching.
2006 NATIONAL EXIT POLL
VOTED IN 2004
(adjusted weights and vote shares)
........Mix Dem GOP
Kerry 51% 94% 5% C Kerry's true 2004 vote
Bush 46% 13% 85% C Bush's true vote
Other 1% 62% 21% C Third parties had 1% of the vote
DNV 2% 79% 18% C did not vote in 2004
Total 98.3% 56.1% 42.2%
2-pty 100% 57.1% 42.9%
The adjusted Democratic 2-party national vote
share is now 57.1%. That's within 0.2% of the
Nov.7 trend line (see above).
_______________________________________________________________
GENDER
Based on the 2006 National Exit Poll 2-party vote shares,
the national split was 54.4% Dem-45.6% GOP.
That's an 8.8% spread. Much too low.
2006 NATIONAL EXIT POLL
GENDER
(adjusted weights and vote shares)
.......Mix Dem GOP
Male 48% 51% 47%
Female 52% 56% 43%
Total 98.5% 53.6% 44.9%
2-pty 100% 54.4% 45.6%
Ask these questions, regarding national vote shares:
WHY THE 2.8% DISCREPANCY BETWEEN "GENDER" AND
"HOW
VOTED"?
WHY THE 5% DISCREPANCY BETWEEN "GENDER" AND
"PARTY-ID"?
Once again, let's adjust the weights and vote shares to get a
result which
approximates the Generic vote.
GENDER (Adjusted)
.......Mix Dem GOP
Male 46% 53% 47%
Female 54% 57% 43%
Total 100% 55.2% 44.8%
This is just further confirmation that the Final
2006 NEP was matched to a corrupt vote count,
just as it was in in 2004 and 2000.
Edison-Mitofsky never consider the possibility
of a corrupt vote
count in discussing their exit poll methodology.
WHY DO THEY DO THIS?
WHY DO THEY ALWAYS ASSUME ZERO FRAUD?
WHY DO THEY ALWAYS ASSUME A PRISTINE VOTE COUNT?
THAT'S WHY THE FINAL NATIONAL EXIT POLLS ARE ALWAYS WRONG.
THAT'S WHY THE FINAL EXIT POLLS ALWAYS LOW-BALL THE
DEMOCRATIC VOTE.
THAT'S WHY THE FINAL EXIT POLLS NEVER MATCH FINAL
PRE-ELECTION POLLS.
THAT'S WHY THE EARLY, UNCONTAMINATED EXIT POLLS ARE CLOSE TO
THE TRUTH.
AND THAT'S WHY THEY'LL NEVER SHOW US RAW EXIT POLL DATA.
by TruthIsAll, posted on Democratic Underground by Autorank
________________________________________________
This entry was posted on Saturday, November 11th, 2006 at 5:14 pm and is filed under '06 Election, Exit Polls, General, Main Stream Media, TruthIsAll.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
· Print
·
