<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citizen-gathered evidence shows an increasing likelihood of electoral fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electionfraudblog.com/2006/citizen-gathered-evidence-shows-an-increasing-likelihood-of-electoral-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electionfraudblog.com/2006/citizen-gathered-evidence-shows-an-increasing-likelihood-of-electoral-fraud/</link>
	<description>Defending Democracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://electionfraudblog.com/2006/citizen-gathered-evidence-shows-an-increasing-likelihood-of-electoral-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-2420</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionfraudblog.com/index.php/citizen-gathered-evidence-shows-an-increasing-likelihood-of-electoral-fraud/#comment-2420</guid>
		<description>Released Jan. 27, 2007, in an online article with datasets:

OHIO 2004: 6.15% Kerry-Bush vote-switch found in probability study

Defining the vote outcome probabilities of wrong-precinct voting has revealed, in a sample of 166,953 votes (1 of every 34 Ohio votes), the Kerry-Bush margin changes 6.15% when the population is sorted by probable outcomes of wrong-precinct voting.

The Kerry to Bush 6.15% vote-switch differential is seen when the large sample is sorted by probability a Kerry wrong-precinct vote counts for Bush. When the same large voter sample is sorted by the probability Kerry votes count for third-party candidates, Kerry votes are instead equal in both subsets.

Read the revised article with graphs of new findings:

The 2004 Ohio Presidential Election: Cuyahoga County Analysis
How Kerry Votes Were Switched to Bush Votes

http://jqjacobs.net/politics/ohio.html

PowerPoint:  http://jqjacobs.net/politics/vote_switching.ppt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Released Jan. 27, 2007, in an online article with datasets:</p>
<p>OHIO 2004: 6.15% Kerry-Bush vote-switch found in probability study</p>
<p>Defining the vote outcome probabilities of wrong-precinct voting has revealed, in a sample of 166,953 votes (1 of every 34 Ohio votes), the Kerry-Bush margin changes 6.15% when the population is sorted by probable outcomes of wrong-precinct voting.</p>
<p>The Kerry to Bush 6.15% vote-switch differential is seen when the large sample is sorted by probability a Kerry wrong-precinct vote counts for Bush. When the same large voter sample is sorted by the probability Kerry votes count for third-party candidates, Kerry votes are instead equal in both subsets.</p>
<p>Read the revised article with graphs of new findings:</p>
<p>The 2004 Ohio Presidential Election: Cuyahoga County Analysis<br />
How Kerry Votes Were Switched to Bush Votes</p>
<p><a href="http://jqjacobs.net/politics/ohio.html" rel="nofollow">http://jqjacobs.net/politics/ohio.html</a></p>
<p>PowerPoint:  <a href="http://jqjacobs.net/politics/vote_switching.ppt" rel="nofollow">http://jqjacobs.net/politics/vote_switching.ppt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Weintraub</title>
		<link>http://electionfraudblog.com/2006/citizen-gathered-evidence-shows-an-increasing-likelihood-of-electoral-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Weintraub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionfraudblog.com/index.php/citizen-gathered-evidence-shows-an-increasing-likelihood-of-electoral-fraud/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>&#160;WE ARE SCREWED!
  

George Bush as declared Martial Law. Google says so.

When George Bush signed The Military Commissions Act of 2006 into law, all Americans became subject to immediate incarceration without charge or the right of redress (Google: â€œHabeas Corpusâ€ and â€œ5th Amendmentâ€); George Bush asserts that the U.S. military is able to both â€œpoliceâ€ the people during States of Emergency and to use intelligence that was collected unlawfully (Google: â€œPosse Comitatus Act of 1878â€); The Ronald Reagan presidential files---describing in some detail the governmentâ€™s projected ability to suspend the Constitution and to hold anti-government dissidents in internment camps---were recently sealed by President Bush (Google: â€œExecutive Order 13233â€ and â€œRex 84â€); George Bush subscribes to the same Constitutional interpretation that Richard Nixon did with regard to the total legality of ALL Presidential acts during times of war (Google: â€œUS v. Nixon 1974 ,â€ Detainee Treatment Act of 2005â€, â€œPresidential Signing Statementsâ€ and â€œNSA Wiretapping Programâ€); Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez wants to arrest journalists who publish articles deemed a threat to national security (Google â€œUSA Patriot Actâ€).

Now, Google â€œMartial Lawâ€ and connect the dots.

Bush Speaks!!
  

My Fellow Americans:

I know that some of you donâ€™t like me, but your children and grandchildren will thank me for my foresight and courage. I am saving us all from destruction! So, for the sake of your kids, try not to see it as voter fraud. See it more as reshaping election results for the sake of our nationâ€™s survival. Try not to see it as squashing dissent. See it more as keeping us all on board in our war against Islamo-Fascism. Try not to see it as the end of our Democratic Republic. See it more as necessary short-term adjustments to our great political system as we seek to defeat the enemies of freedom. I love you all. May God Bless.

George W. Bush
  
  Oh boo hoo, ACLU. Sob, sob, Russ Feingold. Everyone&#039;s so sad: &quot;Our civil liberties are going bye bye&quot;, they cry. The just-signed-into-law Military Commissions Act of 2006---which eliminates Habeas Corpus rights for accused terrorists, permits warrantless arrest and detention of American citizens, and legalizes the harshest forms of interrogation for incarcerated individuals---is making all of the Democrats and all of the Liberals so sad.

Sniffle, sniffle, whine, whine.

Truth be told, the new law means absolutely nothing. Nada. Don&#039;t you listen to your President? &quot;Over the past few months, the debate over this bill has been heated, and the questions raised can seem complex. Yet, with the distance of history, the questions will be narrowed and few: Did this generation of Americans take the threat seriously? And did we do what it takes to defeat that threat?&quot; The President and his circle in Washington see

the world, and their destiny to save it, very clearly. First and foremost they all agree that winning the war on terror---which includes making sure that no rogue nations join the nuclear fraternity---is the only option. There is, simply put, nothing more important that this. Secondly they believe---as Richard Nixon did before them---that all actions taken by the President in defense of the nation are legal.

Sure, George Bush will lean on the Military Commissions Act as he defends his future actions---arrest and detention of American activists, suspension of the 22nd Amendment, implementation of Martial Law---but the truth is that

George Bush and his guys would carry out these actions regardless of Congresses&#039; rubber stamp of approval. (In case you haven&#039;t been paying attention: they already have.)

We are so fantastically stupid. We get all huffy and puffy and hot under the

collar about minutia like the Military Commissions Act and, in the process, we totally miss the big picture. George Bush and his Washington junta must laugh themselves to sleep every night as they watch as have a collective temper tantrum about any number of Red Herrings---while quietly, and with a self-assured sense of their own righteousness and moral duty to the nation, they plan the systematic deconstruction of our American Republic.

I happen to think that it&#039;s too late to change this course. We&#039;ve waited too long. We&#039;ve given our President 6 years to become completely entrenched in his delusional sense of moral destiny. He is long gone. Crying

about a silly little law only presents him with more children to pat on the head and to tell that he knows their upset, but he&#039;s the dad and he knows what&#039;s best.

&#160;

&#160;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;WE ARE SCREWED!</p>
<p>George Bush as declared Martial Law. Google says so.</p>
<p>When George Bush signed The Military Commissions Act of 2006 into law, all Americans became subject to immediate incarceration without charge or the right of redress (Google: â€œHabeas Corpusâ€ and â€œ5th Amendmentâ€); George Bush asserts that the U.S. military is able to both â€œpoliceâ€ the people during States of Emergency and to use intelligence that was collected unlawfully (Google: â€œPosse Comitatus Act of 1878â€); The Ronald Reagan presidential files&#8212;describing in some detail the governmentâ€™s projected ability to suspend the Constitution and to hold anti-government dissidents in internment camps&#8212;were recently sealed by President Bush (Google: â€œExecutive Order 13233â€ and â€œRex 84â€); George Bush subscribes to the same Constitutional interpretation that Richard Nixon did with regard to the total legality of ALL Presidential acts during times of war (Google: â€œUS v. Nixon 1974 ,â€ Detainee Treatment Act of 2005â€, â€œPresidential Signing Statementsâ€ and â€œNSA Wiretapping Programâ€); Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez wants to arrest journalists who publish articles deemed a threat to national security (Google â€œUSA Patriot Actâ€).</p>
<p>Now, Google â€œMartial Lawâ€ and connect the dots.</p>
<p>Bush Speaks!!</p>
<p>My Fellow Americans:</p>
<p>I know that some of you donâ€™t like me, but your children and grandchildren will thank me for my foresight and courage. I am saving us all from destruction! So, for the sake of your kids, try not to see it as voter fraud. See it more as reshaping election results for the sake of our nationâ€™s survival. Try not to see it as squashing dissent. See it more as keeping us all on board in our war against Islamo-Fascism. Try not to see it as the end of our Democratic Republic. See it more as necessary short-term adjustments to our great political system as we seek to defeat the enemies of freedom. I love you all. May God Bless.</p>
<p>George W. Bush</p>
<p>  Oh boo hoo, ACLU. Sob, sob, Russ Feingold. Everyone&#8217;s so sad: &#8220;Our civil liberties are going bye bye&#8221;, they cry. The just-signed-into-law Military Commissions Act of 2006&#8212;which eliminates Habeas Corpus rights for accused terrorists, permits warrantless arrest and detention of American citizens, and legalizes the harshest forms of interrogation for incarcerated individuals&#8212;is making all of the Democrats and all of the Liberals so sad.</p>
<p>Sniffle, sniffle, whine, whine.</p>
<p>Truth be told, the new law means absolutely nothing. Nada. Don&#8217;t you listen to your President? &#8220;Over the past few months, the debate over this bill has been heated, and the questions raised can seem complex. Yet, with the distance of history, the questions will be narrowed and few: Did this generation of Americans take the threat seriously? And did we do what it takes to defeat that threat?&#8221; The President and his circle in Washington see</p>
<p>the world, and their destiny to save it, very clearly. First and foremost they all agree that winning the war on terror&#8212;which includes making sure that no rogue nations join the nuclear fraternity&#8212;is the only option. There is, simply put, nothing more important that this. Secondly they believe&#8212;as Richard Nixon did before them&#8212;that all actions taken by the President in defense of the nation are legal.</p>
<p>Sure, George Bush will lean on the Military Commissions Act as he defends his future actions&#8212;arrest and detention of American activists, suspension of the 22nd Amendment, implementation of Martial Law&#8212;but the truth is that</p>
<p>George Bush and his guys would carry out these actions regardless of Congresses&#8217; rubber stamp of approval. (In case you haven&#8217;t been paying attention: they already have.)</p>
<p>We are so fantastically stupid. We get all huffy and puffy and hot under the</p>
<p>collar about minutia like the Military Commissions Act and, in the process, we totally miss the big picture. George Bush and his Washington junta must laugh themselves to sleep every night as they watch as have a collective temper tantrum about any number of Red Herrings&#8212;while quietly, and with a self-assured sense of their own righteousness and moral duty to the nation, they plan the systematic deconstruction of our American Republic.</p>
<p>I happen to think that it&#8217;s too late to change this course. We&#8217;ve waited too long. We&#8217;ve given our President 6 years to become completely entrenched in his delusional sense of moral destiny. He is long gone. Crying</p>
<p>about a silly little law only presents him with more children to pat on the head and to tell that he knows their upset, but he&#8217;s the dad and he knows what&#8217;s best.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
