Election Fraud Blog

June 16th Show-Down with ES&S and Diebold

The following are two PDFs and one Word doc that we need to get on every website, newsletter and all media outlets.

1) Press release regarding the California Election Protection Network to Oppose Diebold and ES&S at a June 16th Sacramento Hearing. Everyone is invited for the fun: http://www.dfa-marin.org/June16HearingPressRelease.pdf

2) Here is a short blurb on the 6/16 event in a Word doc format: http://www.dfa-marin.org/DriveDiebold.doc

3) Here is the California Election Protection Network’s position statement submitted to the Election Assistance Commission in response to their request for input (before May 25, 2005) on how to implement the Jan. 1 2006 Centralized Voter Registration as mandated by HAVA: http://www.dfa-marin.org/CEPN_sm.pdf

Californians Say "NO" to Vote Pirates
The California Election Protection Network (“CEPN”), over 25 citizen groups across California working together to achieve their mutual election integrity goals, invites you to join them at the Voting Systems & Procedures Panel (“VSPP”), Thursday, June 16th, 9 AM, in front of the Secretary of State’s office, 1500-11th Street, Sacramento, 95814. Testify in favor of open and clean elections at the 10:00 am VSPP hearing. The VSPP approves voting systems for California.

Rock the boat.
Protect our vote!

For more info & to read CEPN’s full press release,
contact Sherry Healy: Sherry@CalifElectProtect.net

Of all the evidence I have seen that the Republican-owned vote counting machines were rigged, this is some of the strongest.

At 12:21AM, after the polls had closed, the CNN exit polls were showing Kerry winning the popular vote with a 2.5% margin.

At 1:41AM, CNN Drastically changed the Exit poll numbers on their screen (to reflect the numbers coming out of the vote counting machines).

Anyone with a rudimentary knowlege of math can prove the "Updated" CNN exit poll numbers were faked.

Both CNN screens showed that of those polled, 53% were Women, 47% Men.

The 12:21AM screen shows 51% of men voted for Kerry and 53% of women voted for Kerry, and a total of 1,963 were polled.

The 1:41AM screen shows 47% of men voted for Kerry and 50% of women voted for Kerry, and a total polled of 2,020. (57 more people were polled)

12:21AM Calculations:
Of 1,963 polled, 47%(% Men) x 51% (% Men who voted for Kerry) + 53%(% Women) x 53%(% Women who voted for Kerry = 52.1% of 1,963, or 1,022 voted for Kerry.

1:41AM Calculations:
Applying the same calculations to the 2,020 number displayed at 1:41AM, you find only 991 voted for Kerry!?

How can the number of people who said they voted for Kerry DECREASE after 57 people were added to the total?

Time Bush Kerry Total
12:21AM 941 1022 1963
1:41AM 1029 991 2020
Change: +88 -31 +57

After 57 more people were polled, Bush’s total was increased by 88 and Kerry’s total was decreased by 31.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph…

=============
Has anyone seen an explanation? What is CNN’s explanation? How do the Republicans explain this?